The Work

What Feral Hog Operators Actually Do

Removal is a sequence of documented tasks, not a single act of catching an animal.

Record reviewed: Sep 4, 2026

An operator at dawn reviewing a tablet beside a truck and trailer of trap panels, studying hog tracks along a muddy fence line with a trail camera mounted nearby.

Catching a hog is one step inside a longer documented sequence. Public agreements describe assessment, confirming authority and access, transporting and deploying equipment, monitoring it, responding to a capture, removing and dispositioning animals, keeping records, invoicing, closing out, and sometimes returning for follow-up.

What the record shows

One documented model: the City of Dallas solicitation BTZ25-00028917 for feral hog control and abatement services. These are the requirements Dallas wrote for its own contract. They are Dallas-specific, and they are not a statewide or industry-wide mandate.

Dallas requiredDocumented experience before award

A minimum of two years of commercial feral hog or large animal trapping experience in an urban environment, plus three references for work of similar scope.

Dallas requiredApplicable state licensure

Appropriate Texas Parks and Wildlife Department licensure for the work performed. Licensing questions depend on activity, animal handling, and disposition, so requirements are not uniform across every job in Texas.

Dallas requiredA written plan with measurable goals

A control and abatement plan with measurable damage reduction goals, not just a promise to place equipment.

Dallas requiredMonitoring and daily checks

Remote monitoring using cameras, along with daily checks of deployed equipment.

Dallas requiredResponse and removal timing

Removal of captured animals within 24 hours, alongside stated response requirements for the contract.

Dallas requiredEvidence attached to invoices

Date stamped photographs and quantity or weight receipts attached to monthly invoices, with documented disposal where applicable.

Dallas requiredInsurance and performance review

Insurability and insurance coverage, a performance review process with an opportunity to cure, and transition and closeout requirements at the end of the engagement.

A worker in a high visibility vest documenting a corral trap in a suburban greenbelt beside a walking trail, with houses and a parked truck behind.

How Dallas selected a vendor

The 2026 Dallas legislative record for File 26-1601A describes a five year as needed service price agreement. Seven proposers responded. Evaluation weighted approach at 35 points, cost at 30, experience at 30, and local preference at 5.

The same record describes how the City looked for suppliers: emails to vendors registered under relevant commodity codes, historical solicitation information, internet research, and vendor contacts supplied by the using department. That is a procurement process, not a directory of qualified operators, and it does not tell you who is available today.

Why it matters

When removal is described as one act, the parts that consume time and money become invisible: travel, siting, monitoring, the daily obligation to check equipment, the animal handling that follows a capture, and the records that make the work auditable.

Those less visible parts can affect schedule and price, and two quotes that look similar may describe different amounts of work.

The part public records tend to understate

The Dallas scope also restricted publicity concerning contract activity. That supports one narrow point only: public web visibility can understate government contract experience, because some agreements limit what a vendor may publicize. It is not evidence about any particular operator.

Limits and Scope of This Evidence

The requirement detail on this page comes from a single jurisdiction (Dallas) and a single solicitation. Other buyers write different terms.
The scope document linked here is a third-party mirror of the City solicitation, so verify against the City record where exact language matters.
Procurement documents describe what a buyer asked for. They do not establish what was delivered.

What This Page Does Not Claim

That these Dallas requirements apply to operators generally, or that operators statewide must meet them.
That any operator is vetted, licensed, exempt, insured, qualified, available, or endorsed by Texas Hog Dispatch.
That Texas Hog Dispatch performs trapping or that a dispatch service is operating. It is not.
That Dallas, TPWD, or any other agency endorses this page.

Sources

Record reviewed September 4, 2026. Documents linked below were public at that date. Contract requirements belong to the buying jurisdiction named, not to operators generally.

City of Dallas, File 26-1601A (2026) legislative record
cityofdallas.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?FullText=1&GUID=16D915B0-EE74-4471-AEFD-C718877614EB&ID=8012478&Options=&Search=
City of Dallas RFCSP BTZ25-00028917 scope of work
govtribe.com/file/government-file/5-01-feral-hog-control-and-abatement-services-scope-of-work-dot-pdf

City of Dallas RFCSP BTZ25-00028917 scope of work: Third-party mirror of the City of Dallas solicitation document, not a City-hosted copy.

Operator Perspective or Correction

If a document here is out of date, mischaracterized, or missing context, send the correction with its source to data@texashogdispatch.com. Field context from working operators is welcome. Nothing sent is published as an endorsement, and we do not publish proprietary methods, customer identities, property locations, or private price sheets.

Report a data error